Andrey Gorodissky & Partners Have Successfully Brought to a Close a Dispute that Arouse out of a Contractor’s Agreement

21.09.2015
AGP have managed to prove to the court irrelevance of the evidence which had been submitted by the plaintiff (customer under the agreement) who was seeking recovery from AGP’s client the cost of materials that had been delivered to it for the performance of work under the contractor’s agreement. AGP objected to satisfaction of plaintiff’s request for the change of the relief that had been demanded by it, whereby the plaintiff purported to also change the cause of action. The plaintiff’s motion was dismissed by the court and the plaintiff (one of the largest communications services supplier in Moscow) at the same hearing filed a request for withdrawal of its claim.

The dispute was closed in a single hearing because by consent of the parties the preliminary hearing was passed into the hearing of the case on the merits, which resulted in acceptance by the Commercial (Arbitrazh) Court of Moscow of the withdrawal of the plaintiff’s claim. AGP’s client was represented by Attorney-at-Law Marina Abramova.